Sometimes a person feels that someone is close by, even though nobody can be seen. Researchers call this a felt presence or feeling of a presence. The experience can feel vivid; describing it does not decide what caused it.
We looked at two original research papers that tested whether changes to the brain or to body-related sensory signals could produce a similar experience under controlled conditions.
01 / A CLINICAL OBSERVATION
A presence that followed one patient
In a 2006 case report, researchers described a patient undergoing brain mapping before epilepsy surgery. Electrical stimulation at one site near the left temporoparietal junction repeatedly produced the feeling of an unfamiliar person nearby. The reported presence appeared to follow changes in the patient’s posture.[1]
What this can show: stimulation at a particular site was linked to the experience in this patient. What it cannot show: that this site is the cause of every felt presence.
02 / A CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT
When touch and movement did not line up
In a 2014 study, researchers combined clinical observations with experiments using a robotic system. Participants moved a device in front of them while a second device touched their back. The researchers varied whether the touch matched the participants’ movements in timing and position.
Under some conflicting conditions, participants reported feeling another person nearby or feeling touched by that presence. The authors interpreted the results as evidence that mismatches among movement, touch, and body-position signals can contribute to a felt presence in this experimental setup.[2]
The experiment induced a related experience in a laboratory. It did not recreate every real-world situation in which someone may report a presence.
03 / WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
A useful clue, not a complete answer
Together, these studies support a narrow conclusion: in specific clinical and laboratory settings, altering body-related signals or stimulating a particular brain area can produce a felt-presence experience.
They do not tell us how often this happens, explain every spontaneous experience, or settle what any individual experience means. A controlled experiment can test one possible mechanism; it cannot stand in for all people or circumstances.
COSMINDRA VERDICT
Possible mechanism, limited scope
There is experimental evidence that sensorimotor processing can contribute to some felt-presence experiences. The broader phenomenon has no single explanation established by these two studies.
SOURCES / PRIMARY RESEARCH
Read the studies
- [1]Arzy, S. et al. (2006). “Induction of an illusory shadow person.” Nature, 443, 287.
PubMed record and abstract ↗ Single-patient clinical case report. - [2]Blanke, O. et al. (2014). “Neurological and robot-controlled induction of an apparition.” Current Biology, 24(22), 2681–2686.
PubMed record and abstract ↗ · DOI ↗Clinical lesion analysis and controlled robotic experiments.
This page summarizes the cited papers; follow the links for the authors’ methods, results, and limitations.